A platform for component confidence.

Orbital Veritas brings preferred-parts intelligence, radiation evidence, test pipeline visibility, and mission-specific interpretation together.

The workflow connects selection, testing, lifecycle tracking, and review evidence for technical decisions.

Component decisions are harder to defend.

New Space teams use more COTS, industrial, and automotive components to improve availability, cost, and performance.

Those components were not built for orbital environments; lot, date-code, process, PCN, and package changes can shift risk.

Orbital Veritas structures that work so it becomes repeatable and evidence-based.

Four connected
platform modules.

Each module keeps a different part of the assurance workflow visible.

Teams move from part record to test status, evidence, and interpretation without rebuilding context.

PPL database

Curated intelligence for COTS, industrial, and automotive components relevant to New Space electronics.

The PPL is not a general approval; it is an evidence-based starting point.

Explore the database

Test pipeline

Component tracking from nomination through testing, assessment, and date-code surveillance.

The pipeline supports customer-sponsored, shared, and manufacturer-backed campaigns.

View the pipeline

Evidence packages

Summaries, lot context, and interpretation notes for technical reviews.

The goal is traceable, useful evidence without overstating qualification.

Request evidence

Mission assessment

Interpretation against orbit, shielding, duration, criticality, and mitigation.

The output is a clear recommendation: candidate, mitigate, test, substitute, restrict, or avoid.

Start assessment

Täiendav tõlgitud kontekst workflowTitle.

Täiendav tõlgitud kontekst workflowIntro.

01

Identify candidate parts

Start from power, communication, memory, sensing, timing, and control functions.

02

Check PPL status

See whether the component is listed, in assessment, tested, monitored, or restricted.

03

Review available evidence

Connect public data, reports, manufacturer notes, and radiation summaries.

04

Decide test priority

Determine whether evidence is sufficient or a new campaign is needed.

05

Interpret against mission

Assess orbit, duration, shielding, criticality, and acceptable risk.

06

Create decision evidence

Generate a structured basis for reviews and internal selection.

Täiendav tõlgitud kontekst useCasesTitle.

Täiendav tõlgitud kontekst useCasesIntro.

Satellite OEMs

Reduce uncertainty in COTS, industrial, and automotive components.

Subsystem suppliers

Reuse evidence across multiple programs.

Assurance teams

Improve traceability and review quality.

Manufacturers

Identify credible families for New Space.

Laboratories

Connect test demand with structured campaigns.